Diff for Soap over JMS

Tue, 2008-06-03 13:03 by carolgeyerTue, 2008-06-03 13:04 by carolgeyer
Changes to Body
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
Soap over JMS is a very good idea, I think. But there need to be some
 
Soap over JMS is a very good idea, I think. But there need to be some
-
work done on the productivity and connectivity, to be really usefull. I
+
work done on the productivity and connectivity, to be really useful. I
 
would not dare to say that there is no future for Soap over JMS. But I
 
would not dare to say that there is no future for Soap over JMS. But I
 
think in most cases I would need the reliability over a very long
 
think in most cases I would need the reliability over a very long
-
distance (like my The Hague/Munich example). If you do indeed have the
+
distance... If you do indeed have the
 
same requirement (reliable messaging over a long distance) I would
 
same requirement (reliable messaging over a long distance) I would
-
suggest you to take a look into the ebXML/ebMS standards. Oracle
+
suggest you take a look into the ebXML/ebMS standards. Oracle
 
Integration B2B for example could help you with that.
 
Integration B2B for example could help you with that.
 
</p>
 
</p>
Current revision:

Soap over JMS

Soap over JMS is a very good idea, I think. But there need to be some work done on the productivity and connectivity, to be really useful. I would not dare to say that there is no future for Soap over JMS. But I think in most cases I would need the reliability over a very long distance... If you do indeed have the same requirement (reliable messaging over a long distance) I would suggest you take a look into the ebXML/ebMS standards. Oracle Integration B2B for example could help you with that.

Read the complete article by Darwin IT.

XML.org Focus Areas: BPEL | DITA | ebXML | IDtrust | OpenDocument | SAML | UBL | UDDI
OASIS sites: OASIS | Cover Pages | XML.org | AMQP | CGM Open | eGov | Emergency | IDtrust | LegalXML | Open CSA | OSLC | WS-I